英語六級閲讀理解真題及答案

在英語6級考試中，閲讀理解始終是考察的重點和難點，可以通過做一些真題及來提高分數。為此本站小編為大家帶來大學英語六級閲讀理解真題及答案。

　　大學英語六級閲讀理解真題及答案

Section B

Directions:In this section,you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to statement contains information given in one of the tify the paragraph from which the information is may choose a paragraph more than paragraph is marked with a er the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.

Can societies be rich and green?

[A]“If our economies are to flourish,if global poverty is to be eliminated and if the well-being of the world’s people enhanced—not just in this generation but in succeeding generations—we must make sure we take care of the natural environment and resources on which our economic activity depends.”That statement comes not,as you might imagine,from a stereotypical tree-hugging,save-the-world greenie(環保主義者),but from Gordon Brown,a politician with a reputation for rigour,thoroughness and above all,caution.

[B]A surprising thing for the man who runs one of the world’s most powerful economies to say?Perhaps;though in the run-up to the five-year review of the Millennium(千年的)Goals,he is far from roots of his speech,given in March at the roundtable meeting of environment and energy ministers from the G20 group of nations,stretch back to 1972,and the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm.

[C]“The protection and improvement of the human environment is a major issue which affects the well-being of peoples and economic development throughout the world,”read the final declaration from this gathering,the first of a sequence which would lead to the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992 and the World Development Summit in Johannesburg three years ago.

[D]Hunt through the reports prepared by UN agencies and development groups—many for conferences such as this year’s Millennium Goals review—and you will find that the linkage between environmental protection and economic progress is a common thread.

[E]Managing ecosystems sustainably is more profitable than exploiting them,according to the Millennium Ecosystem finding hard evidence to support the thesis is not so ghts turn first to some sort of global statistic,some indicator which would rate the wealth of nations in both economic and environmental terms and show a relationship between the two.

[F]If such an indicator exists,it is well on reflection,this is not surprising;the single word“environment”has so many dimensions,and there are so many other factors affecting wealth—such as the oil deposits—that teasing out a simple economy-environment relationship would be almost impossible.

[G]The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment,a vast four-year global study which reported its initial conclusions earlier this year,found reasons to believe that managing ecosystems sustainably—working with nature rather than against it—might be less profitable in the short term,but certainly brings long-term rewards.

[H]And the World Resources Institute(WRI)in its World Resources 2005 report,issued at the end of August,produced several such examples from Africa and Asia;it also demonstrated that environmental degradation affects the poor more than the rich,as poorer people derive a much higher proportion of their income directly from the natural resources around them.

[I]But there are also many examples of growing wealth by trashing the environment,in rich and poor parts of the world alike,whether through unregulated mineral extraction,drastic water use for agriculture,slash-and-burn farming,or fossil-fuel-guzzling(大量消耗) course,such growth may not persist in the long term—which is what n and the Stockholm declaration were both attempting to point aps the best example of boom growth and bust decline is the Grand Banks almost five centuries a very large supply of cod(鱈魚)provided abundant raw material for an industry which at its peak employed about 40,000 people,sustaining entire communities in ,abruptly,the cod population e were no longer enough fish in the sea for the stock to maintain itself,let alone an than a decade later,there was no sign of the ecosystem re-building had,apparently,been fished out of existence;and the once mighty Newfoundland fleet now gropes about frantically for crab on the sea floor.

[J]There is a view that modern humans are inevitably sowing the seed of a global Grand Banks-style idea is that we are taking more out of what you might call the planet’s environmental bank balance than it can sustain;we are living beyond our ecological recent study attempted to calculate the extent of this“ecological overshoot of the human economy”,and found that we are using 1.2 Earth’s-worth of environmental goods and services—the implication being that at some point the debt will be called in,and all those services—the things which the planet does for us for free—will grind to a halt.

[K]Whether this is right,and if so where and when the ecological axe will fall,is hard to determine with any precision—which is why governments and financial institutions are only beginning to bring such risks into their economic is also the reason why development agencies are not united in their view of environmental issues;while some,like the WRI,maintain that environmental progress needs to go hand-in-hand with economic development,others argue that the priority is to build a thriving economy,and then use the wealth created to tackle environmental degradation.

[L]This view assumes that rich societies will invest in environmental is this right?Do things get better or worse as we get richer? Here the Stockholm declaration is ambiguous.“In the developing countries,”it says,“most of the environmental problems are caused by under-development.”So it is saying that economic development should make for a cleaner world?Not necessarily;“In the industralised countries,environmental problems are generally related to industrialisation and technological development,”it other words,poor and rich both over-exploit the natural world,but for different ’s simply not true that economic growth will surely make our world cleaner.

[M]Clearly,richer societies are able to provide environmental improvements which lie well beyond the reach of poorer zens of wealthy nations demand national parks,clean rivers,clean air and poison-free also,however,use far more natural resources-fuel,water(all those baths and golf courses)and building materials.

[N]A case can be made that rich nations export environmental problems,the most graphic example being climate a country’s wealth grows,so do its greenhouse gas figures available will not be completely uring emissions is not a precise science, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding land use;not all nations have re-leased up-to-date data,and in any case,emissions from some sectors such as aviation are not included in national the data is exact enough for a clear trend to be easily countries become richer,they produce more greenhouse gases;and the impact of those gases will fall primarily in poor parts of the world.

[O]Wealth is not,of course,the only factor average Norwegian is better off than the average US citizen,but contributes about half as much to climate could Norway keep its standard of living and yet cut its emissions to Moroccan or even Ethiopian levels?That question,repeated across a dozen environmental issues and across our diverse planet,is what will ultimately determine whether the human race is living beyond its ecological means as it pursues economic revival.

ples show that both rich and poor countries exploited the environment for economic progress.

ronmental protection and improvement benefit people all over the world.

is not necessarily true that economic growth will make our world cleaner.

common theme of the UN reports is the relation between environmental protection and economic growth.

lopment agencies disagree regarding how to tackle environment issues while ensuring economic progress.

is difficult to find solid evidence to prove environmental friendliness generates more profits than exploiting the natural environment.

ainable management of ecosystems will prove rewarding in the long run.

43.A politician noted for being cautious asserts that sustainable human development depends on the natural environment.

countries will have to bear the cost for rich nations’ economic development.

recent study warns us of the danger of the exhaustion of natural resources on Earth.

參考答案

36. 正確選項 I

37. 正確選項 C

38. 正確選項 L

39. 正確選項 D

40. 正確選項 K

41. 正確選項 E

42. 正確選項 G

43. 正確選項 A

44. 正確選項 N

45. 正確選項 J

　　英語六級閲讀理解難點解題技巧

1、從句多又長 　　一個主句帶多個從句，從句中又有從句。應對方法：首先找到主句的主體部分(即主語、謂語和賓語)，再確定從句的主體部分，如果從句中還有從句，在確定下面一層從句的主、謂、賓。注意閲讀時一層一層進行，先把同一層次的內容看完，再看下一層次的內容。

2、長長的插入成分

閲讀所選文章的一大特點就是喜歡用插入語，比如，用插入語交代某句話是誰説的，説話人是什麼身份;或是用插入語來修飾、解釋、補充前面的內容等等。插入語使作者能更靈活地表達自己的意思，但是插入語過長或是過多容易使讀者找不到閲讀的重點。從形式上看，插入語的出現有明顯標誌：用雙破折號與主句隔開或者用雙逗號與主句隔開。應對方法：讀句子時，先不要理會插入語，先把主句的意思看完。然後再看插入部分。

3、分詞狀語、獨立主格結構的干擾

分詞狀語就是指用doing或done引導的伴隨狀語、原因狀語等;獨立主格結構有時由with引導，看似主謂結構，但實際上並沒有真正的謂語部分。由於這些成分的干擾，不僅增加了句子的長度，而且使人很容易錯把它們當成主句。在這裏，我們不去仔細研究它們的語法構成，而主要研究一下在閲讀時怎樣分辨主句和這些從屬部分。

應對方法：主句最重要的特徵就是有完整的主謂結構，尤其是獨立的謂語部分。什麼樣的詞能構成獨立的.謂語部分?注意：dodoes和isamare的各種時態變化都可以做謂語，但是單純的to dodoingdone和to bebeing的形式是不可以做謂語的。一個看似句子的結構，如果沒有獨立的謂語部分，那它就不是句子，而是分詞短語或者獨立主格結構。

在實際的閲讀過程中，我們常常會碰到包含上面三種情況的超複雜句子，即：一個句子中既有從句又有插入成分，還有分詞狀語或者獨立主格結構。閲讀這種句子的正確方法是：從前向後，抓住獨立的謂語部分從而區別出主句和分詞狀語，再根據從句的連接詞(有時無連接詞)區分主句和從句，層層理解，插入語插在哪個層次中就放在哪個層次中理解。

　　英語六級閲讀理解做題技巧

快速閲讀對理解深度和層次要求不高，因此考試中通常只出現兩種題型：主旨題和細節題。主旨題主要考查考生對所讀文章主要輪廓、主要內容或中心思想等全局性問題的理解和把握;而細節題主要考查考生對細節問題如具體介紹、數字、步驟等局部性內容的理解。

1.主旨題的解題技巧

根據英文文章的寫作特點，解答快速閲讀的主旨題時要注意以下幾點：

(1)快速閲讀文章第一、二段，抓住文章大意、背景和作者風格，因為作者一般會在文章開頭幾段概述全文;

(2)快速瀏覽找出每段的中心句和幾件事實，抓住一兩個關鍵詞，如果文中段落大意沒有用一句話總結，就自己歸納出大意，在可能藴含全文主旨的部分進行仔細閲讀;

(3)注意轉折詞和序列詞，有助於我們瞭解文章的脈絡。

用於快速閲讀的文章，在通常情況下每個小部分會有一個小標題，這樣對考生迅速閲讀文章並掌握文章的主旨大意非常有幫助，考生要善於利用這一點。另外，因為文章和段落結構通常遵守某種體裁的結構模式，因此在快速閲讀時，並不需要每句話都仔仔細細地閲讀。

2.細節題的解題技巧

快速閲讀文章後面的10道試題中大部分都是細節題，因此對細節題的解題技巧要熟練掌握。

(1)首先，確定自己要找的信息。在閲讀文章之前，目光快速掃描一遍後面的題目;

(2)其次，瞭解文章的信息分佈。可查讀各章節小標題進行定位，確定可能含有所需信息的部分;

(3)最後，找出所需的具體信息。在已經定位的區域，快速閲讀直至鎖定答案。

---