GMAT寫作機經精選

GMAT考試是由美國經企管理專業研究生入學考試委員會(GMAC)委託新澤西州普林斯頓的美國考試中心(ETS)主辦的，在我國的舉辦單位是中國國外考試協調處(CIECB)。下面是yjbys網小編提供給大家關於GMAT寫作機經精選，供大家備考。

　　篇一：工作建議(本月原始)

V1講的是一個報紙寫了關於career的advice：

作者建議有stable office job的人，千萬不要辭職當self-employed worker.有以下原因：

1. self-employed 的人在家工作有很多distraction，例如phone call, noisy neighbor,和household chore.

2. self-employed 的人not likely to set schedule，所以他們會procrastinate或者not working.

3. self-employed 的人在家工作，會socially and professionally isolated, 所以他們的advancement會受到limit.

因此，office job肯定好且lead to more earning.

V2 今天是people working at home不好，a steady office job更好什麼的，文中把在家工作不好的缺點列了一下，先是説在家會受到鄰居的噪音影響啊，有三個，還有就是在家沒有schedule啊，最後就説在家working會使自己的社交圈和朋友圈isolated，因此對professional career不好什麼

　篇二：有機食品店

　本月原始

作文因為自己寫了30分鐘，所以大致內容還是記得的。是一個gym的manager給owner寫的memo。這個manager説our customers interest in eating healthier。然後提高飲食健康的一個方法是吃organic food。 現在city 還沒有organic grocery store。然後這個manager就説，我們應該在什麼chiain的商店進入之前，趕快在我們的gym裏增加一個賣有機食品的商店，肯定妥妥的賺錢啊(這是個反駁的點。。。吧。。。)!

考古

V1. 下面的XX出現在一個下屬給上級彙報的'memo裏：某個城市有chain gym 3個，最近對gym customer (就是在gym鍛鍊的人羣)做了一個調查，發現customers 開始重視飲食健康 eat healthier，然後説一種提高飲食健康的辦法是吃有機食品。現在city沒有organic grocery store(我估計是説沒有專門買organic的shop，比如像wholefood那樣的)，現在city有一些retailer(大概是這個意思)想要開organic food的店。Gym覺得自己應該在它們之前下手，在每個gym裏增加一個專門賣有機食品的unit，這樣可以增加gym的profit。

V2. 一個gym公司最近對其顧客調查顯示customers都對eating healthier感興趣。然後説eating healthier的一個方式就是eating organic food，而且這座城市裏現在還沒有organic food grocery，所以這公司打算在他的每個gym location旁開一個organic food grocery 説肯定能對公司盈利有幫助，而且這個公司的profit已經好幾年沒怎麼變動了。

　參考思路

1. 樣本不足：只調查了在gym鍛鍊的人，這些人有良好的生活習慣，一般都更重視吃得健康。而且這種風尚可能只限於在gym鍛鍊的人之間流行。

2. 無根據假設：拓展經營領域開Grocery Store不一定就能增加利潤，開幾家店的cost會很大，revenue能cover the cost麼?況且這家做Health and fitness的公司幾年都沒漲利潤，通過拓展經營領域能否賺到錢?幾年未盈利可能是因為公司裏的管理體制有問題，營銷手段不得當等等。

3. 因果關係：人們越來越傾向吃健康食品並不意味着人們會越來越傾向於去有機食品店購買。

　篇三：Olympic Foods

　本月原始原題

The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods.

“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

　　參考思路

1. 錯誤類比：The food industry is not analogous to the color film industry. 食品行業與彩色膠片行業不能等同。

2. 因果關係：Other factors that may contribute to the cost decline of the printing cost should be considered and ruled out. 彩色膠片例子中的成本降低不一定是因為組織學習增加效率，還可能是技術改進、原料價格下降、福利增加激勵員工等。

3. 無根據假設：The conclusion of the argument is based on a gratuitous assumption that the company can minimize cost and maximize profit because the company has been conducted for 25 years. 因為 (1)不是有經驗就可以節約成本 (2)不是cost下降profit就會增加，只有在銷量不減少或者增加的情況下才成立

　　參考範文

Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient.” This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the author’s rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.

First, the author’s forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods’ “long experience” has taught it how to do things better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency is entirely unfounded.

Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.

As it stands the author’s argument is not compelling. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn from industries more similar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate the author’s view.