雅思英語寫作範文

引導語：為了幫助大家更好地準備雅思英語考試，以下是本站小編為大家整理的雅思英語寫作範文，歡迎閲讀!

範文一

　　年輕人可以當領導

Task：The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader,to what extent do you think?

Sample answer：

It is true that many leaders and senior executives in global companies are elderly people. However, I would argue that those superb young people are also eligible to take important positions in today’s world.

On the one hand, compared to the young generation,elderly people possess more t and foremost, they have better cognitive skills, such as big-picture thinking and long-term vision. This is because years of work experience and failures teach them to take every aspect into consideration before making important decisions. By contrast, due to alack of social experience, young leaders seem to make shortsighted decisions sometimes. Moreover, since the old have already overcome countless difficulties and challenges prior, they can quickly adjust their mood in turmoil and lift the morale of the whole organisation.

On the other hand, there are two reasons why younger directors are also competent to be leaders in important positions. In the first place, with well-educated backgrounds, young leaders are more likely to have a deep understanding of cultural difference, and they can empathize with other employees and clients much better. Today, empathy plays a key role in retention of talents. For example, it is easy to misunderstand others in a cross-cultural dialogue. When good employees resign,they might take the company’s knowledge with them, which is a brain drain for the company. Secondly, compared with the senior leaders, young directors can apply the latest technology and theory into practice, and this can counteract negative stereotype of management and greatly improve the productivity.

In conclusion, in my opinion, age should not be the criterion when selecting the leader of a company. Anyone who has the leadership can play his or her role in the organization.

　範文二

　　飛機限制問題

Automobiles produce less pollution than do airplanes. Automobiles also consume less fossil fuel. Therefore it is necessary to restrict some flights. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

The argument that the flights should be restricted is invalid. Clearly, it is unconvincing to compare the volume of pollutants an airplane produces with that generated by an automobile, because an airplane is shared by many passengers while an automobile is usually for one or, at the best, several passengers.

Suppose a visitor drives 1,000 miles, burning 100 liter gasoline and emitting 10 cubic meter carbon dioxide, this very passenger is totally responsible for such an environment problem. But to what extent should another passenger, who travels the same distance by air, take environment responsibility? If the airplane consumes 10,000 liter gasoline and produces 1000 cubic meter carbon dioxide and if altogether 300 passengers share the flight, then traveling by air causes less environmental damage.

Another thing must also be in the list of consideration: the time. Traveling by air saves time. The point is that even if traveling by automobiles consumes less energy and produces less pollutants, traveling by air has a variety of reasons. For instance, a patient is transported by air from where she is injured to the hospital.

The opponents might argue that this is not the “unnecessary flights”. Nevertheless it is ambiguous and vague to use such a term. How to define an “unnecessary” flight? Is there a legal or generally accepted criterion against which the feature of a flight can be clearly and correctly labeled as “necessary” or “unnecessary”? Nay.

Therefore, the argument mentioned in the topic is neither logically sound nor practically significant.

　範文三

　　電腦網絡優缺點分析

題目：With computers and Internet, people can study and work without going to school or company. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

參考範文：

When it comes to the issue about the Internet, some people argue that their efficiency will be lower if they could study or work at home using the Internet, but I cannot agree with this opinion.

Initially, using the Internet could serve as an efficient contributing factor to save more time for people. For those who live in a metropolis, it is common for them to spend two or even three hours on the way to schools or companies and back home. However, distance learning or working assists them to avoid the possible traffic congestion they may meet during the commuting time. Thus, because of the existence of Internet, learners or workers are potent to distribute more time to their study or work.

Furthermore, it is beneficial to study or work at home because people could arrange their schedules more freely. Some students or workers have the higher efficiency during daytime while others may be more efficient at night. Studying or working at home enables individuals to allocate their time to different tasks according to their willingness. For example, for some art subjects, inspiration could be sparked better during a silent night, but not common working time.

But the refuting voice may come from the opponents that working or studying alone at home may deprive people of the chance of communication; however, they oversimplify this situation. It is true that most employees or learners do tasks at home by themselves, but the fact is that they still have various methods to communication with peers or workmates, and it is the Internet that also provides them with convenient ways of keeping in touch with other people.

In conclusion, people could benefit more if they adopt the way of working or learning by Internet, considering that they could save more time and have a free timetable.