雅思寫作高分範文

引導語：為了幫助大家更好地準備雅思英語考試，以下是本站小編為大家整理的雅思寫作高分範文，以供參考學習，歡迎閲讀!

範文一

　　出國工作利弊

題材：出國工作

題型：利弊分析

本題中未確定的概念是哪些?

l 什麼工作?賺錢為目的還是援助目的?

l 哪些國家? 發達國家，發展中國家?文化形同的'國家還是文化相近似的國家?

l 什麼人出國工作?在自己國內窮困潦倒備受欺辱壓抑?還是國內生活幸福，尋求更高的理想和人生的價值?

l 我們的文化中對出國持有什麼的態度?

It is necessary to make clear several key terms before discussing the advantages and disadvantages of working abroad for a period of time. The first is the feature of the job and the aim of the person in a foreign country. The second is the culture and economic characteristics of the foreign country.

If a person comes to a foreign country not to make money but to help others, regardless of the forms of job, the advantages of working in the foreign country are obvious. The main reason is that the meaning of life is nothing but to help others. To help others in a foreign county, for instance, to cure or to teach, makes life brilliant. If, however, one is forced to go abroad because of poor living condition in his or her own country, it will be hard to say whether it is good or bad. Suppose the person survives and thrives in the foreign country, it is advantageous. Otherwise, if the person fails to make a living, who dare to say it is advantageous to work abroad?

Another contributing factor is the economic, cultural, and other social characteristics of the foreign country. If one person works in a country where the culture is not conflict with his or her own, he or she might find easy to do the job. But at the same it is impossible for this person to learn a new culture. Therefore, it is hard to conclude whether it is negative or positive. Moreover, the economic condition of the foreign country plays a key role in this discussion. In a developed country, to work makes more money, improving the living standard. In a less developed country, to do some job might have other merits.

To sum up, it is impossible to draw an absolute conclusion about the pros and cons of working in a foreign country due to many ambiguous terms in sense.

　範文二

　　飛機限制問題

Automobiles produce less pollution than do airplanes. Automobiles also consume less fossil fuel. Therefore it is necessary to restrict some flights. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

The argument that the flights should be restricted is invalid. Clearly, it is unconvincing to compare the volume of pollutants an airplane produces with that generated by an automobile, because an airplane is shared by many passengers while an automobile is usually for one or, at the best, several passengers.

Suppose a visitor drives 1,000 miles, burning 100 liter gasoline and emitting 10 cubic meter carbon dioxide, this very passenger is totally responsible for such an environment problem. But to what extent should another passenger, who travels the same distance by air, take environment responsibility? If the airplane consumes 10,000 liter gasoline and produces 1000 cubic meter carbon dioxide and if altogether 300 passengers share the flight, then traveling by air causes less environmental damage.

Another thing must also be in the list of consideration: the time. Traveling by air saves time. The point is that even if traveling by automobiles consumes less energy and produces less pollutants, traveling by air has a variety of reasons. For instance, a patient is transported by air from where she is injured to the hospital.

The opponents might argue that this is not the “unnecessary flights”. Nevertheless it is ambiguous and vague to use such a term. How to define an “unnecessary” flight? Is there a legal or generally accepted criterion against which the feature of a flight can be clearly and correctly labeled as “necessary” or “unnecessary”? Nay.

Therefore, the argument mentioned in the topic is neither logically sound nor practically significant.

範文三

　　有錢才是成功嗎

Topic: only when people make a large sum of money can they be said successful. Do you agree or disagree?

It is vital to define success although currently criteria are colorful. A sound definition of the term helps people to live and learn better. Moreover, it plays an important role in the construction of good social mores.

It is wrong to say that people are not successful if they have failed to make a huge sum of money. The reason is that whether one is successful is not only measured with material yardstick but also against the spiritual criterion. Spiritual achievements and contributions bear little relationship with money. Put it in other word, many of those who have not earned sufficient money are considered successful for their accomplishments. For instance, my mother has never been able to make enough money but she is successful in that she has told us why we live.

To emphasize the spiritual elements in the understanding of what success is is not to deny the importance of the ability to make money. On the contrary, the capability to make a massive sum of money in many cases is a kind of success. In terms of the individual development, any human being in a modern society where money is the main economic dimension must be able to live independently by means of earning and spending. In terms of the society development, a country must be rich enough to protect basic human rights, provide foods, and offer education to its members. Otherwise it is not successful.

In conclusion, money is not the only standard of success, but it is necessary to be able to make money.