2015年ACCA《公司法与商法》精选试题及答案
Question:
Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.
In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.
Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.
Required:
In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.
Answer:
The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.
There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.
Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).
When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).
It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.
Remedies for breach of contract
(i) Specific performance
It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.
(ii) Damages
A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.
-
ACCA国内考点
上海考点地址:I987上海东北上海兰生大酒店,杨浦区曲阳路1000号I997上海西南好望角大饭店,肇嘉浜路500号;青松城大酒店,肇嘉浜路777号I844上海浦东通茂大酒店,上海松林路357号(源深路,浦电路口)北京考点地址:I998北京语言文化大学,2号教学楼北京海淀区学院路15号I837对...
-
ACCA10年成绩有效期取消
问:ACCA原10年成绩有效期取消是好事吗?答:对于不能免试的学员来说是好事,因为ACCA10年有效期的老规则存在不公平性,比如无免科的学员需要把ACCA14科在10年内全部考完。有免科的学员层次不齐,有的免1科,有的免3科,有的免5科,有的甚至免9科,所有有免科的学员只需要把剩下...
-
立足财会精英圈,从考取ACCA开始
为什么现在ACCA学员的主力军是以大学生为主?固然是因为ACCA考试的报考门槛较低,同时也说明越来越多的大学生正在思考自己的将来,乐于提前为自己的未来做好打算同时付诸行动。这是应届毕业生网小编乐于见到的,也是ACCA协会乐于见到的,因为你不去改变人生的话就只会...
-
ACCA考试规则及免试政策
考试规则1.申请参加ACCA考试者,必须首先注册成为ACCA学员。2.学员必须按考试大纲设置的先后次序报考,即知识课程,技能课程,核心课程和选修课程。在一个课程中可以选择任意顺序报考。但ACCA建议在一个课程中也按照顺序报考。3.除免试和已通过的课程外,每次最多报考4...