Passage Eighteen (Strictly Ban smoking)英語閲讀理解
Passage Eighteen (Strictly Ban smoking)
If you smoke and you still don’t believe that there’s a definite link between smoking and bronchial troubles, heart disease and lung cancer, then you are certainly deceiving yourself. No one will accuse you of hypocrisy. Let us just say that you are suffering from a bad case of wishful thinking. This needn’t make you too uncomfortable because you are in good company. Whenever the subject of smoking and health is raised, the governments of most countries hear no evil, see no evil and smell no evil. Admittedly, a few governments have taken timid measures. In Britain for instance, cigarette advertising has been banned on television. The conscience of the nation is appeased, while the population continues to puff its way to smoky, cancerous death.
You don’t have to look very far to find out why the official reactions to medical findings have been so lukewarm. The answer is simply money. Tobacco is a wonderful commodity to tax. It’s almost like a tax on our daily bread. In tax revenue alone, the government of Britain collects enough from smokers to pay for its entire educational facilities. So while the authorities point out ever so discreetly that smoking may, conceivable, be harmful, it doesn’t do to shout too loudly about it.
This is surely the most short-sighted policy you could imagine. While money is eagerly collected in vast sums with one hand, it is paid out in increasingly vaster sums with the other. Enormous amounts are spent on cancer research and on efforts to cure people suffering from the disease. Countless valuable lives are lost. In the long run, there is no doubt that everybody would be much better-off if smoking were banned altogether.
Of course, we are not ready for such a drastic action. But if the governments of the world were honestly concerned about the welfare of their peoples, you’d think they’d conduct aggressive anti-smoking campaigns. Far from it! The tobacco industry is allowed to spend staggering sums on advertising. Its advertising is as insidious as it is dishonest. We are never shown pictures of real smokers coughing up their lungs early in the morning. That would never do. The advertisement always depict virile, clean-shaven young men. They suggest it is manly to smoke, even positively healthy! Smoking is associated with the great open-air life, with beautiful girls, true love and togetherness. What utter nonsense!
For a start, governments could begin by banning all cigarette and tobacco advertising and should then conduct anti-smoking advertising campaigns of their own. Smoking should be banned in all public places like theatres, cinemas and restaurants. Great efforts should be made to inform young people especially of the dire consequences of taking up the habit. A horrific warning – say, a picture of a death’s head – should be included in every packet of cigarettes that is sold. As individuals, we are certainly weak, but if governments acted honestly and courageously, they could protect us from ourselves.
1. Why do a few governments take timid measures toward smoking?
[A] because they are afraid of people.
[B] Because diseases cost a lot.
[C] Because they are afraid of the cutting down of their revenue.
[D] Because they are afraid of manufacturers.
2. The tone of this passage is
[A] critical.
[B] ironical.
[C] distaste.
[D] amusing.
3. What does the sentence “because you are in good company” mean?
[A] you are backed by the government.
[B] You are not alone.
[C] You have good colleagues.
[D] Governments are blind to evils of smoking too.
4. What is the best title of this passage?[A] World Governments should conduct serious campaigns against smoking.
[B] World governments take timid measures against smoking.
[C] smoking is the most important source of income to many countries.
[D] tobacco industry spends a large sum of money on medical research.
Vocabulary
1. a wishful thinking 根據願望的想法,不顧事實的想法
2. puff 噴
puff its way to 一路吞雲吐霧走向(指抽煙抽到死)
3. lukewarm 冷淡/漠然
4. insidious 陰險的,狡猾的
5. virile 年富力強的
寫作方法與文章大意
這是一篇“要求政府禁煙”的論説文,採用因果對比手法。先以諷刺口吻指出政府對禁煙的態度――軟弱無力。然後點明軟弱的原因――大量税收。再以抽煙大嚴重後果,機器所花去的錢説明得不償失。而煙草工業廣告氾濫,毒化人們。從而提出政府應從禁止煙廣告作起。
答案詳解
1. C 因為他們害怕收入減少。答案見第二段。“你不用看得很遠就能發現為什麼官方對醫學成果的反應如此冷淡,答案就是錢。煙草是徵税的最奇妙的商品,幾乎就像日用麪包的税收。光煙草税收一項,英國政府就從抽煙人身上徵到足以支付整個教育措施的費用。所以在當局那麼謹慎地指出吸煙有害時,可以想象,喊叫得太響時不行的。”
A.他們害怕人民。D.他們害怕廠商。文中沒有。B.疾病花費很大和軟弱無力的禁煙措施有關。不是花費大而採取弱政策。
2. B 諷刺語氣。特別表現在第一段、第四段。
A.批評語氣,整篇文章都在批評,這不是什麼語氣問題。這裏時以諷刺的口吻加以批評政府軟弱的禁煙政策。C.厭惡。D.有趣。
3. D 政府對吸煙的惡果也是視而不見。
A.政府支持。太明朗化。B.你不是單獨一人。和C.你有好同事,都是似是而非的答案。這可以上下文説明,第一段:“假如你吸煙,依然認為吸煙和支氣管炎、心臟病、肺癌等毫無關係,那你是自欺欺人。可沒有人會説你虛偽。我們可以説你是患有一廂情願病。這你無需太難受,因為你有好夥伴。每當提出吸煙和健康有關的問題時,大多數國家的政府對其惡果視而不見、聽而不聞、嗅而不覺。”
4. A 世界各國政府應該開展眼裏的.禁煙運動。因為前面四段都是現象:⑴政策軟弱。如英國政府只在電視上禁止煙草廣告以高位人們的良知。另一方面人民繼續一路吞雲吐霧走到癌症死亡。⑵講煙草的税收高,所以不嚴禁。⑶這項政策的後果是疾病花費大於煙草税收。⑷煙草廣告氾濫毒害人。唯一解救的辦法就是禁煙。最後一段是結論,也是畫龍點睛的主題和標題。“作為起步,政府可以從禁止煙草廣告開始,然後應開展抵制吸煙的廣告運動。一切公共場合,如戲院、電影院、返點等應禁止吸煙。應竭盡全力告誡青年,尤其是告誡他們染上惡習的嚴重後果。在零賣的每包煙盒上應有一令人膽戰心驚的警告:例如,一幅骷髏頭畫像。作為個人,我們力量薄弱,可是如果政府真誠地鼓舞人心的行動起來,他們可以保護我們。”
B.世界各國政府採取禁煙政策軟弱無力。C.吸煙是許多國家重要收入。這兩項是不分具體內容。D.煙草工廠在醫療研究上花了大筆費用。
-
八年級的英語月考反思(精選5篇)
在現實社會中,課堂教學是我們的任務之一,反思過去,是為了以後。怎樣寫反思才更能起到其作用呢?下面是小編收集整理的八年級的英語月考反思,僅供參考,希望能夠幫助到大家。八年級的英語月考反思1這次月考結束了,成績很不理想。面對成績,談幾點自己的反思。1.學生的基礎...
-
個人教學業務工作總結
個人教學業務工作總結總結就是把一個時段的學習、工作或其完成情況進行一次全面系統的總結,它能使我們及時找出錯誤並改正,是時候寫一份總結了。總結怎麼寫才能發揮它的作用呢?以下是小編精心整理的個人教學業務工作總結,供大家參考借鑑,希望可以幫助到有需要的朋友...
-
開學第一課觀後感(精選33篇)
當品味完一部作品後,這次觀看讓你有什麼領悟呢?是時候抽出時間寫寫觀後感了。那麼我們如何去寫觀後感呢?下面是小編幫大家整理的開學第一課觀後感,供大家參考借鑑,希望可以幫助到有需要的朋友。開學第一課觀後感篇1每年的《開學第一課》是我最愛看的節目,我聽從班主...
-
韓愈《馬説》優秀的教學設計(精選11篇)
作為一名為他人授業解惑的教育工作者,通常需要準備好一份教學設計,藉助教學設計可以更好地組織教學活動。教學設計應該怎麼寫才好呢?下面是小編整理的韓愈《馬説》優秀的教學設計,希望對大家有所幫助。韓愈《馬説》優秀的教學設計篇1教學目的1.理解短文《馬説》所...
相關文章
- Is a Test of Spoken English Necessary英語四級作文
- the most interesting subjuct and thing英語作文
- 分享SAT閲讀練習題:Reading Comprehension Test 14
- Why Public Speaking Is So Important 公共演説的重要性大學英語
- 英語閲讀:African Union Leaders Talk Mali, Chinese Investmen
- 英語滿分作文:Reading-TheBestMeanstoAcquireknowledge
- 最新《Fate/Stay Night Unlimited Blade Works》經典名句
- 英語閲讀:VIT declines to acquire Ang Mo Kio property
- 英語口語:Teaching and Learning Responsibility
- 英語作文閲讀:Bad News for the Highly Intelligent