2016年PETS5級閲讀模擬試題及答案

PETS—5考試的評價標準相當於我國大學外語專業二年級結束時的水平，為幫助大家在閲讀理解題取得更好的分數，本站小編為大家分享最新閲讀模擬試題及答案解析如下：

　　2016年PETS5級閲讀模擬試題(一)

A Frenchman had arrived at a small Italian (意大利的，意大利人) town and was staying with his wife at the best hotel there. One evening he went out for a walk ( 1). It was late and the small street was dark and ( 2). Suddenly he ( 3) some footsteps behind him. He ( 4) his head and saw an Italian young man quickly walk ( 5) him. The man was nearly ( 6) sight when the Frenchman suddenly found his ( 7) was gone. He thought ( 8) it was the Italian who ( 9) his watch. He decided to follow him and force him (10) the watch. Soon the Frenchman (11) up with the Italian. They didn’t understand (12) language. The Frenchman threatened (威脅) the Italian (13) signs and pointed to his watch-pocket. (14) thought that the Frenchman was demanding his (15) watch. The Italian, in the end, (16) his watch to the Frenchman. When he returned to the hotel the Frenchman told his wife (17) had happened. He was greatly (18) when his wife pointed to the watch on the table. (19) he realized that by mistake he had (20) the Italian of his watch.

lly 　　　　　lonely　　　　　　together　　　　　alone

n 　　　　　　alone 　　　　　　quietly 　　　　　lonely

ed at 　　　　saw 　　　　　　　heard 　　　　　　listened to

ed　　　　　　turned　　　　　　shook 　　　　　　threw

　　　　　　　　past　　　　　　　over　　　　　　　through

of　　　　　　in　　　　　　　　out 　　　　　　　away from

k 　　　　　　watch 　　　　　　glasses 　　　　　walking-stick

　　　　　　　which 　　　　　　what　　　　　　　that

taken 　　　　took　　　　　　　got 　　　　　　　had brought

give 　　　　　return　　　　　　to return 　　　　give back

　　　　　　　caught　　　　　　put 　　　　　　　ran

other’s　　　each others’　　　the other’s 　　　others’

　　　　　　　in　　　　　　　　with　　　　　　　by

Italian 　　　An Italian　　　　A Frenchman 　　　The Frenchman

ly　　　　　　gold　　　　　　　new 　　　　　　　own

up 　　　　　giving up 　　　　giving back 　　　gave back

　　　　　　　what　　　　　　　which 　　　　　　/

ppointed　　　moved 　　　　　　interested　　　　surprised

　　　　　　　However 　　　　　So　　　　　　　　As

en　　　　　　taken 　　　　　　robbed　　　　　　bought

　　答案:

DDCBB ABDAC BACAD ABDAC

　　2016年PETS5級閲讀模擬試題(二)

President Clinton’s decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and Whit House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked “the courage” to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop.

In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administration’s goal of a “bullet-proof agreement” that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.

THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, “we’re not there yet,” according to senior officials.

Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although Clinton can signal U.S. approval for China’s entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss) declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms (R-N.C.) and Emest F. Hollings (D-S. C.) promised to introduce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal.