2017公共英語五級寫作考前預測題

Nothing is to be got without pains but poverty.以下是小編為大家搜索整理的.2017公共英語五級寫作考前預測題，希望能給大家帶來幫助!更多精彩內容請及時關注我們應屆畢業生考試網!

　　part 1

結構要點求職信是申請具體職位的信件，包括下列三個部分：

1. 説明應聘職位;

2. 介紹自身情況;

3. 請求回覆並表示感謝。

　　Write a letter in about 100 words to apply for a typist advertised in a newspaper. Do not sign your own name at the end of your letter, using “Li Ming” instead.

　　Dear Sir,

Learning from your advertisement for a typist in the newspaper, I hasten to write to seek this vacancy. The reason why I take keen interest in the post is that my training and experiences well meet the requirements you stated in the advertisement.

I was born in 1975. After my graduation from high school, I took one year’s special training for clerical work and English and then served in Yuxing Company as the manager’s secretary until my husband was transferred to Shanghai last July.

My typewriting speed is about 100 words per minute. I am enthusiastic and have organized working habits and good interpersonal skills, as are described in the enclosed recommendation by my former boss.

If I were favored with an interview, I would be most grateful. Please contact me at 13827388873.

Best wishes.

Yours sincerely,

Li Ming

　　part 2

　　Directions:

It has been more than 30 years since man first landed on the moon. Some people think that space research is a waste of money. Write an essay of no less than 250 words.

　　範文(2)

Since the 1960s, there has been some heated discussion on the feasibility of space research. Some people, free lancers or columnists in particular, always emphasize that it involves the bulk of investment that never expects financial reward. However, through years of practice and observation, this statement turns out to have a number of restrictions.

Admittedly, the idea held by the people who lament over the annual budget in a package of space projects does contain an element of truth. But these arguers tend to ignore two other essential aspects. First, they fail to take into consideration the possibility that a country can utilize its cutting-edge technology in the moon landing projects, thus profiting significantly from satellite development, data transmission or rocket lift-off. In this sense, space investment is not always synonymous to a waste of money. Second, the arguers’ assertion doesn’t provide sufficient data to narrow down the exact extent of the financial loss. Therefore, any further conclusion addressing the problem of space research must be based on thorough investigation. As a matter of fact, space research and exploration provides the primary incentive for the development of space shuttles, space stations and sky labs, let alone other benefits from the discovery of rare material to the observation of new heavenly orbs. In this respect, money return is not the sole hallmark of the space research. Given reasons above, the argument above, under scrutiny, tend to be groundless in its hasty conclusion.

In conclusion, the arguers’ evidence lends little credible support to her claim. To persuade people that space research is a waste of money, the arguers would need to provide clear evidence, sufficient data and thorough cost-benefit analysis of alternatives.(280 words)