關於罪犯的懲罰措施的雅思英語作文

有些人認為每個類型的犯罪都應該有固定的懲罰，有的人認為要看犯罪的動機來懲罰。下面有小編整理的關於這個話題的雅思英語作文，大家可以參考參考。

　　Topic : Some people belive that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime . Others , however , argue that the circumstances of an individual crime , and the motivation for committing it , should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment uss both these views and give your own opinion .

Fixing punishments for each type of crime has been a debatable issue . There are many arguments supporting both views , those for and those against fixed punishments .

On the one hand , fixed punishments will have a deterring effect on society . Individuals knowing that they will be subject to a certain punishment if they are convicted with a given crime , will reconsider committing this act in the first place .

This deterring effect also leads to social stability and security , through minimising the number of crimes committed .

If people knew they would be able to convince the court or the jury of a reason for having committed the crime they are accused of , penal decisions would be largely arbitrary . This would result into criminals getting away with their crimes and into a high level of injustice caused by the subjective approach of different courts .

On the other hand , taking the circumstances of a crime and its motivation into consideration is a prerequisite for establishing and ensuring justice and equity .

A person killing in self-defense can not be compared to a serial killer , moving from one victim to the next . In my opinion an intermediary position between both solutions is the perfect way to establish and ensure justice and equity .

There has to be fixed punishment for all crimes . However , criminal laws have to provide for a minimum and maximum for the punishment and the laws also have to foresee certain cases of exemptions .

An example for setting minimum and maximum penalties is competition law where a person being held liable of a crime under this law will be convicted to pay a fine , according to the harm caused by the violation and the profit gained by the violator through committing the crime .

As for the exemptions , in some countries the law exempts thiefs stealing food during a a period of famine taking into consideration the distress and hunger .

Also , a person killing in self-defense will be exempted from punishment.

　　參考翻譯：對每種類型的固定懲罰犯罪一直是一個有爭議的問題。支持這兩種觀點都有很多參數,和那些反對固定的懲罰。

一方面,固定的懲罰會對社會有威懾作用。個人知道他們將受到一定的懲罰,如果他們與給定的犯罪定罪,將在第一時間考慮提交本條例。

這種威懾效應也會導致社會穩定和安全,通過最小化犯罪的數量。

如果人們知道他們能夠説服法庭或陪審團的原因他們犯了罪被指控刑事決定將很大程度上是任意的。這將導致成罪犯盜走他們的罪行和高水平的不公平造成的主觀方法不同的法院。

另一方面,犯罪及其動機的情況考慮是建立和確保公平和正義的先決條件。

一個人出於自衞殺死不能相比,一個連環殺手,從一個受害者。在我看來這兩個解決方案之間的中間位置是最完美的`方式建立和確保公平和正義。

必須有固定的對所有罪行的懲罰。然而,刑法必須提供最小和最大的懲罰,法律也必須預見某些情況下的豁免。

一個例子設置最小和最大的懲罰是競爭法,一個人承擔責任的犯罪在這個法律將會被罰款,根據違反造成的傷害和獲得的利潤由行為人的犯罪。

至於豁免,在一些國家法律免除小偷偷竊食物在饑荒時期考慮痛苦和飢餓。

同樣,一個人殺死在自衞將免除處罰。