6月英语六级阅读真题及答案 第3套 仔细阅读
Passage One
Questions 46 to 50 are based on the following passage. Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 20xx. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census's measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare.
While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 20xx. In 20xx, as the authors observe: real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France's consumption with the U.S.'s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy's performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-20xxs, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 20xx, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated-for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. does the author think of the 20xx report by the Census Bureau? is based on questionable statistics. reflects the economic changes. evidences the improved-welfare. provides much food for thought.
does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method? is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries. revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people's livelihood. focuses on people's consumption rather than their average income. is a more comprehensive measure of people's economic well-being. do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U. S. in terms of real consumption per person? reflected the existing big gap between the two economies. neglected many important indicators of people's welfare. covered up the differences between individual citizens. failed to count in their difference in natural resources. is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method? can accurately pinpoint a country's current economic problems.
can help to raise people's awareness of their economic well-being. can diagnose the causes of a country's slowing pace of economic improvement. can compare a country's economic conditions between different periods of time. can we infer from the passage about American people's economic well-being? is much better than that of their European counterparts. has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century. has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau. has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-20xxs. Passage Two
Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage. If you've ever started a sentence with, "If I were you...." or found yourself scratching your head at a colleague's agony over a decision when the answer is crystal-clear, there's a scientific reason behind it. Our own decision-making abilities
-
国中英语阅读精选及学习指导
社会现象类阅读:这类文章通过写人记事来揭示文章的主题,显示其社会意义,一般采用顺序或倒叙来叙述。题目经常是一些细节问题。考查的方面可以是原因和其中引发的思考。阅读这类文章要理清思路。描述社会现象英语:安居工程housingprojectforlow-incomefamilies安居...
-
英语阅读细节题解题秘籍
了解细节题的命题模式题干中常见的提示词有:which,what,why,who,how,howmany,cause,because,result,true,nottrue,mention,notmention等。清楚解题核心技巧1、定位:根据题干的定位词回文定位,寻找线索句。题目顺序与文章顺序基本一致,视情况灵活处理。常见的定位特征有...
-
英语阅读理解(通用20篇)
作为一项综合技能测试,“英语知识运用”首先检验的是阅读能力。它也可以说是阅读理解的一个变体,所以解题的首要步骤是将短文的大意理解清楚,提高阅读理解能力。下面是小编带来的英语阅读理解,希望对你有帮助。英语阅读理解篇1根据教育部制定的英语课程标准,国中毕...
-
英语阅读作文翻译技巧
词汇部分1.如何有效掌握考研词汇?答:考研需掌握约5500个单词。有关如何背诵和记忆单词的方法和技巧是许多同学关心的问题,市面上也有不少单词记忆的方法和诀窍。这里建议一种目前为止较为科学,也最契合2010年考研大纲对词汇要求的方法——词根、词源记忆法。记忆单...